Q: What are the particulars that are required to be stated
in the agreement for the sale of a new flat?
The particulars that are to be included in such an agreement
are as follows:
-
The liability of the
promoter to construct the flat according to the plans and
specifications, approved by the local authority if the
building is to be constructed,
-
The date by which the
possession of the flat is to be handed over to the
purchaser;
-
The extent of the carpet
area of the flat, including the area of the balconies, which
should be shown separately;
-
The price of the flat,
including the proportionate price of the common areas and
facilities, which should be shown separately, to be paid by
the purchaser of the flat; and the intervals at which
installments may be paid;
-
The precise nature of the
organization to be constituted of the persons, who have
taken or are to take the flats;
-
The nature, extent and
description of the limited common areas and facilities;
-
The percentage of undivided
interests in the common areas and facilities, appertaining
to the flat that is agreed to be sold;
-
The statement, pertaining to
the permitted use of the flat and restriction of its use, if
any;
Every agreement for the sale of
a flat should contain these minimum particulars. Such
agreement should be accompanied with the true copy of the
Title Certificate by an Attorney-at-law or Advocate; the
Property Card or extract of Village or any other relevant
revenue record, showing the nature of the title of the
promoter to the land on which the flats are constructed or,
are to be constructed; the plans and specifications of the
flat, as approved by the Municipal Commissioner. The agreement
for sale is required to be registered.
Q: If the owner is unable to produce any originals of the
title deeds and the title deeds that he has are only
photocopies/certified copies of the originals, what should be
done?
It is not uncommon for the parties to be unable to produce the
originals. In such a case, a thorough enquiry and examination
must be made as to what has and/or what may have happened to
the originals. If the originals are found to be lost or
misplaced or destroyed, the owners should be called upon to
give a suitable indemnity against any loss or damage that the
buyer may suffer in the event of any third party making an
adverse and/or wrong claim to the property. There is also
another reason for caution:
A seller, sometimes, cannot produce the original title deeds
because he has deposited these with a bank or financial
institution to create a mortgage on the property. This is
known as a mortgage by deposit of title deeds. It does not
require a registered deed, like other forms of mortgage, and
is a preferred means of creating a security, for this very
reason. A property, which is mortgaged, continues to carry the
burden of the mortgage even after it is sold until the
mortgage is redeemed (i.e. paid off). The existence of the
mortgage should not come as a nasty surprise to a purchaser
who buys in good faith since the purchaser will, then, become
liable to pay off the mortgage.
Q: Which remedies are available to the 'seller' if the
purchaser does not pay?
If the consideration - whether full or in part - is not paid
by a purchaser, a seller can not repudiate the sale, but his
remedy in this case, is to sue the purchaser for the price or
balance amount.
It is well established that unless the right to repudiate on
failure of non-payment of the amount of consideration is
expressly reserved in the sale deed, the seller cannot
repudiate the sale. He can, however, sue the purchaser for
price.
The unpaid vendor only has the right to retain the title deeds
and to charge the property with the unpaid price. However, the
seller cannot retain possession on the ground that the price
has not been paid.
Q: Can the gift be made of a property which is not in
existence, i.e. of future property?
No. The subject matter of a gift must be a certain, existing,
moveable or immoveable property. It could be anything such as,
goods, any right, title or interest in any immovable property,
which exists, or even an actionable claim. It must be
transferable within the meaning of Sec.6 of the Transfer of
Property Act. A gift of the right to management is valid. But
a gift of the future revenue of the village is invalid.
Release of a debt is not a gift; because it does not involve
any transfer of property but merely a renunciation of a right
of action.
Q: What are the principal contents of the agreement to lease?
The agreement to lease should contain the following
particulars:
-
Parties to the deed. ("A
lease right can not be created by a person who has no title
in the property.
-
[Rentala vs. Chimmapudi, AIR
1967 SC1793]
-
Details of the property to
be demised
-
Duration of the lease
-
Price/premium, and/or lease
rent/any other thing of value/share of crops etc.
-
Periodicity/specific
occasions when the payment would be made/services that will
be rendered.
-
Date of commencement.
-
Date of determination.
Q: Can the Lessor transfer his interest in the leased
property during the term of lease?
Yes. The Lessor's interest in the demised property is known as
'reversion' and the transfer is known as 'the assignment of
the reversion.' On such transfer, unless there is a contract
to the contrary, the transferee, i.e. the buyer is entitled to
all the rights that the transferor, i.e. the lessor had.
However, the lessor is not relieved of his liabilities to the
lessee, unless the lessee consents thereto.
Q: Can a person other than the parties to the document present
a document for registration? In case a document is presented
by a person, who is not empowered to do so, does the
registration of the document become invalid?
Every document that is to be registered shall be presented at
the proper registration office by the appropriate person (the
parties to the document), his representative or agent, duly
authorized by a power of attorney, executed or authenticated,
according to the procedure, laid down in the Act. Any person
other than the parties also can present such document for
registration provided the concerned party has executed proper
power of attorney in favour of such person empowering such
person to present the document for registration.
If a document is presented for registration by a person, who
is not duly empowered to do so, the registration of the
document becomes invalid. The Registration Act requires a
power of attorney to be given to the agent by the principal,
before it can be presented for registration. The absence of
this renders the registration of the document invalid.
However, the Act itself provides for a remedy. When a person,
who executes such a document, realizes that such registration
is invalid, he can apply to the registrar or the sub-registrar
within four months from the date that he is aware that the
registration is invalid. Subsequently, he can apply for the
re-registration of the document.
Q: Why is registration necessary?
Registration acts as a proof that a transaction has taken
place.
The registration of a document serves as a notice of the
transaction, to the persons affected by the transaction.
Registration also serves as an implied notice to any person
subsequently acquiring interest in the property, covered by
the registered document.
When a document, which is compulsorily to be registered, is
not registered, it fails to confer any title given by the
document.
The real purpose of registration is to ensure that every
person dealing with property for which compulsory registration
is required, can confidently rely on the statement contained
in the register, as being a full and complete account of all
transactions by which the title may be affected. [Lachman Das
v. Ramlal AIR 1989 SC 1923]
Registration is not proof of execution.
When the execution of a document is directly in dispute
between two parties, the fact that the document is registered
is not sufficient to prove its genuineness. Registration does
not automatically dispense with the necessity of independent
proof that the document was executed.
A certificate of Registration is mere evidence that a document
has been registered. It is not proof that it has been
executed.
Q: What is Stamp Duty?
Stamp Duties are taxes payable on every conceivable documented
transaction. It is a form of revenue for a state. The proceeds
of the duty are assigned to the state in which they are
levied. It is payable when any property or other contractual
transaction is entered into in India or even abroad. However,
the subject matter of the transaction must be situated in
India.
Stamp Duty is not payable on the following:
-
documents, executed on
behalf of the Government;
-
testamentary documents;
-
documents, required to be
made for judicial or non-judicial proceedings;
-
documents, filed in judicial
or non-judicial proceedings.
The British Government
introduced Stamp Duty in India by enacting the Indian Stamp
Act, 1899. After the commencement of the Constitution of
India, the power to levy Stamp Duty is vested in the following
manner:
-
The power to prescribe the
rate of duties on commercial instruments is vested in the
Union legislature. (entry 91 of the Union List)
-
The power to reduce or remit
such duties with the Central Government. S. 9 of the Indian
Stamp Act 1899
-
The power to prescribe the
rates of duties on other instrument, vested in the State
Legislature. (entry 63 of the State list)
-
The power to reduce or remit
such duties is vested in the State Government. (S.9 of the
Indian Stamp Act)
All matters, relating to the
mechanism of Stamp duties in respect of both the instruments,
are the subject of entry 44 of the concurrent list.
As an effect of this, the rates of Stamp Duty, in respect of
the instruments, specified in entry 91 of the Union List i.e.
bills of exchange, promissory notes, bills of lading, letters
of credit, policies of insurance, transfer of shares,
debentures, proxies and receipts, are determined by the Union
Government. On the other hand, the State Government is
entitled to levy Stamp Duty with respect to other instruments.
Thus, every State has its own Stamp Act. E.g. as far as the
state of Maharashtra is concerned, the transactions, related
to Stamp Duty, are governed by the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
Q: If the lease is created for a certain specific period, can
it be terminated before the specified period?
Sec.111 of the Transfer of Property Act, supplies the
circumstances in which a lease could be determined. These
circumstances could be summarized as follows:
-
On the expiry of the period
of lease;
-
On the happening of an
event, which is a condition for expiry
-
On the happening of such
event when the lessor's interest in the property terminates;
-
When the persons holding the
ownership and the lease become one and the same person, at
the same time, own the right; this state is also known as a
'merger';
-
When the lessee, expressly,
yields up its interest to the lessor;
-
In the case of an 'implied
surrender,' i.e. by the creation of a 'new relationship'
e.g. where the lessee becomes the mortgagee, the rights of
the former remain in abeyance because his larger rights, as
the mortgagee, come into effect. His rights, as the lessee,
are restored when the mortgage is redeemed;
-
When the lessee breaks the
express condition giving the lessor the right to re-enter
the property: when the lessee sets up a title detrimental to
the interests of the lessor: or, when the lease stipulates
that the lessor may re-enter the property when the lessee is
adjudged insolvent. In such cases, the lessor may give the
lessee notice to terminate the lease. This is, technically,
known as forfeiture;
-
On the expiry of the notice
to terminate the lease or, to quit or, of information to
quit duly given by either party to the other.